An AI visibility audit is a systematic review of your website's discoverability, citability, and authority across AI-powered search platforms — including ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Perplexity, Bing Copilot, and Claude. It goes beyond traditional SEO to measure AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization), the two disciplines that determine whether AI systems can find your content, extract answers from it, and recommend it as a trusted source.

93% of AI Search Sessions End Without a Click. Is Your Website Invisible?

Here is the uncomfortable reality of search in 2026: an estimated 93% of AI-powered search sessions end without the user clicking through to any website. The AI provides the answer directly. If your content is not the source that AI is citing — if your website is not the one being surfaced, quoted, and linked — you are invisible to a rapidly growing segment of users who will never see a traditional search results page.

Traditional SEO audits were built for a world where Google showed ten blue links and users clicked on them. That world is shrinking. Google AI Overviews now appear in over 55% of search queries. ChatGPT has surpassed 200 million weekly active users. Perplexity processes millions of queries daily. Bing Copilot is embedded in Windows, Edge, and Microsoft 365. And Claude powers an expanding ecosystem of AI-assisted research.

Yet the vast majority of SEO audits in 2026 still check only the traditional factors: meta tags, backlinks, page speed, mobile-friendliness. They completely miss the question that increasingly determines whether your website gets traffic: Can AI systems find, understand, and cite your content?

This guide introduces the AI visibility audit — a comprehensive framework for measuring and improving your website's presence across all AI-powered search platforms. We will cover the 3-score measurement system, walk through a 25+ point checklist, share benchmark data from our analysis of 2,000+ websites, and show you how to run your own audit in minutes.

25+
Audit Checks
3
Score Categories
Free
Scanner Included
Only 12% of websites have an LLMS.txt file. The other 88% have not even taken the first step toward AI visibility. Based on our analysis of 2,000+ scanned websites.

The AI Search Landscape in 2026

Before we audit anything, we need to understand what we are auditing for. The AI search landscape in 2026 is not a single platform — it is an ecosystem of different systems, each with its own crawling behavior, content preferences, and citation patterns. Your audit must account for all of them.

The AI Search Ecosystem (2026) Your Website G Google AI Mode 55% of search queries Largest reach AI ChatGPT 200M+ weekly users Fastest growing P Perplexity Research-focused AI Citations-first model B Bing Copilot & Claude Embedded in OS & apps Enterprise adoption Each platform crawls, evaluates, and cites content differently. Your audit must cover all of them.
Figure 1: The AI search ecosystem in 2026 — multiple platforms, each requiring different optimization signals.

The key insight is that each platform has its own crawler and its own preferences. Google AI Mode draws from its existing index but prioritizes structured, authoritative content for AI Overviews. ChatGPT uses GPTBot to crawl the web and favors content that provides direct, quotable answers. Perplexity emphasizes source citation and rewards data-rich content. Bing Copilot leverages the Bing index with AI synthesis. Claude uses ClaudeBot and emphasizes factual accuracy.

An effective AI visibility audit must account for all of these platforms — not just one. Optimizing for ChatGPT alone while blocking Perplexity's crawler, for example, leaves traffic on the table.

What Is an AI Visibility Audit?

An AI visibility audit is the process of evaluating whether your website is discoverable, extractable, and citable by AI-powered search systems. It measures three dimensions that traditional SEO audits do not cover: whether AI crawlers can access your content, whether AI systems can extract structured answers from your pages, and whether your content has the authority signals that make AI systems choose to cite you over competitors.

Think of it this way: traditional SEO asks "Can Google find and rank my page?" An AI visibility audit asks three additional questions:

  1. Access: Can AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot) physically reach my content? Or am I blocking them in robots.txt without realizing it?
  2. Extractability: When an AI system reads my page, can it pull out clean, structured answers? Or is my content buried in unstructured paragraphs, JavaScript-rendered components, or image-only formats?
  3. Citability: Does my content have the authority signals, data depth, and structural clarity that make an AI system choose to cite me as a source rather than a competitor?

Most websites fail on all three dimensions. Based on our analysis of 2,000+ websites scanned through seoscore.tools, the average AEO score is 28 out of 100 and the average GEO score is 13 out of 100. This means the typical website is essentially invisible to AI search — not because AI ignores it deliberately, but because the website gives AI systems nothing to work with.

i
AEO vs GEO: What Is the Difference?

AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) focuses on making your content extractable by AI assistants — FAQ structure, Q&A format, concise definitions, and schema markup. GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) focuses on making your content the preferred source for AI-generated answers — comprehensiveness, data richness, authority signals, and citation readiness. Both are measured in an AI visibility audit. Learn more: What is AEO? | What is GEO?

Traditional SEO Audit vs AI Visibility Audit

A traditional SEO audit and an AI visibility audit are not competing approaches — they are complementary layers. You need both. But understanding the differences is critical because most website owners run only the traditional audit and assume they are covered. They are not.

Traditional SEO Audit vs AI Visibility Audit Traditional SEO Audit 1 Meta tags & title optimization 2 Backlink profile analysis 3 Page speed & Core Web Vitals 4 Mobile-friendliness 5 XML sitemap & robots.txt 6 Broken links & redirects 7 Keyword density & placement 8 Basic schema (Organization, Article) MEASURES "Can Google find and rank my page?" Necessary but no longer sufficient. AI Visibility Audit 1 AI crawler access (GPTBot, ClaudeBot) 2 LLMS.txt & AI discoverability 3 Entity clarity & E-E-A-T signals 4 FAQ structure & Q&A format 5 Schema depth (Speakable, HowTo, FAQ) 6 Citation signals & data tables 7 Content comprehensiveness score 8 Semantic HTML & content extraction MEASURES "Can AI systems cite my content?" The competitive advantage in 2026.
Figure 2: A traditional SEO audit covers the foundation. An AI visibility audit covers the factors that determine AI search presence.

The critical gap is clear. Traditional audits do not check whether GPTBot is blocked in your robots.txt. They do not evaluate whether your content has the Q&A structure that AI assistants extract preferentially. They do not measure schema depth beyond the basics, and they certainly do not assess whether your content has the citation signals (statistics, data tables, source attribution) that make AI systems trust and reference it.

An AI visibility audit fills these gaps. It does not replace the traditional audit — it extends it with the checks that matter for the way people actually search in 2026.

The 3-Score Framework: How We Measure AI Visibility

At seoscore.tools, we measure AI visibility through three complementary scores. Each score addresses a different dimension of search visibility, and together they provide a complete picture of how your website performs across both traditional and AI-powered search.

The 3-Score Framework 76 /100 SEO Score Can search engines find you? 28 /100 AEO Score Can AI assistants cite you? 13 /100 GEO Score Can AI search feature you? Average scores from 2,000+ websites scanned with seoscore.tools. Most websites score well on SEO but fail on AEO and GEO.
Figure 3: Average scores across 2,000+ websites. The gap between SEO (76) and AEO/GEO (28/13) reveals the massive opportunity.

SEO Score: Can Search Engines Find You?

The SEO score measures traditional search engine optimization: technical health, on-page optimization, meta tags, page speed, mobile-friendliness, and schema markup. This is the foundation. If your SEO score is low, AI platforms that rely on search engine indexes (like Google AI Mode) will not find your content either. The average website scores 76/100 here — decent but with room for improvement. Measured across 123 individual checks in our scanner.

AEO Score: Can AI Assistants Cite You?

The AEO score measures Answer Engine Optimization: whether your content is structured for AI extraction. This includes FAQ sections, Q&A format headings, concise definitions, speakable markup, and conversational content structure. The average website scores just 28/100 — meaning most content is structured in ways that AI assistants cannot efficiently extract answers from. This is measured across 54 checks including FAQ presence, schema depth, and content extractability. Learn more: What is AEO?

GEO Score: Can AI Search Feature You?

The GEO score measures Generative Engine Optimization: whether your content has the depth, authority, and data richness that makes AI systems choose to feature it. This includes content comprehensiveness, comparison tables, statistics, source citations, entity clarity, and multi-format content. The average website scores a dismal 13/100 — meaning almost no websites are optimized for the way AI search platforms select and present sources. Measured across 60 checks. Learn more: What is GEO?

123 SEO Checks
54 AEO Checks
60 GEO Checks
245 Total Checks

Complete AI Visibility Audit Checklist (25+ Items)

This checklist covers every factor that determines whether AI systems can find, understand, and cite your content. Work through each category systematically, or use seoscore.tools to scan all of them automatically.

1. AI Crawler Access

Before anything else, AI systems need to be able to reach your content. This is the most fundamental check in an AI visibility audit, and it is the one that the most websites fail silently.

  • robots.txt does not block AI crawlers. Check your robots.txt file for directives that block GPTBot (OpenAI/ChatGPT), ClaudeBot (Anthropic/Claude), CCBot (Common Crawl, used by many AI systems), PerplexityBot (Perplexity), and Bytespider (ByteDance). Many websites added broad AI blocks in 2023-2024 without realizing this makes them invisible to AI search. If you want AI traffic, you must allow AI crawlers. Check: yoursite.com/robots.txt. Learn more: Robots.txt and AI Crawlers
  • LLMS.txt file is present and accurate. LLMS.txt is a proposed standard (similar to robots.txt) that provides AI systems with structured information about your website: what your site is about, which pages are most important, and how AI should present your content. Only 12% of websites have one. Creating an LLMS.txt file is a quick win for AI discoverability. Place it at yoursite.com/llms.txt with a description, key URLs, and content guidelines.
  • No AI-specific meta blocks. Some CMS plugins add <meta name="robots" content="noai"> or similar directives. Check your page source for any AI-blocking meta tags. These are separate from standard noindex tags and specifically prevent AI systems from using your content.
  • Content is not behind JavaScript-only rendering. AI crawlers have varying levels of JavaScript execution capability. GPTBot and ClaudeBot handle basic JavaScript, but complex SPAs (Single Page Applications) can be partially or fully invisible to them. Verify that your critical content renders in the raw HTML source, not only after JavaScript execution. Test with curl yoursite.com — if the content is missing from the raw HTML, AI crawlers may miss it too.
  • Server response time under 3 seconds. AI crawlers have limited crawl budgets. If your server responds slowly, crawlers will index fewer of your pages. Aim for a server response time (TTFB) under 500ms and full page load under 3 seconds. Slow sites get crawled less frequently by both search engines and AI systems.

2. Content Structure for AI Extraction

This category determines whether AI systems can actually pull structured answers from your pages. The difference between a page that AI can cite and a page it skips often comes down to how the content is formatted.

  • FAQ sections on key pages. Add a dedicated FAQ section with 5-8 questions on every important page. Use actual questions that users search for (check Google's "People Also Ask" for ideas). Answer each question in 2-4 concise sentences directly below the heading. AI systems extract FAQ content preferentially because it is already in the exact format they need. FAQ Schema Markup Guide
  • Q&A format headings. Beyond FAQ sections, structure your body content with question-based headings. Use questions as H2 or H3 headings, then answer them directly in the first sentence below the heading. Example: "How long does an AI visibility audit take?" followed by "A basic AI visibility audit takes 5-10 minutes with an automated scanner." This pattern is the most-cited content structure across all AI platforms we have observed.
  • Concise definitions in the first paragraph. Every informational page should open with a clear, one-to-two sentence definition or direct answer in bold. AI systems prioritize the opening paragraph when extracting definitive statements. Do not bury your key insight after three paragraphs of introduction — front-load it.
  • Bullet and numbered lists for key information. AI systems extract list-based content with higher accuracy than dense paragraphs. When presenting steps, features, criteria, or comparisons, use lists. Each list item should start with a bolded key phrase. This "term + explanation" format is the most extractable structure for AI-generated summaries.
  • Comparison tables with clear headers. When comparing products, tools, approaches, or strategies, use properly structured HTML tables with descriptive column and row headers. AI systems cite comparison tables at a significantly higher rate than the same information presented as prose. Each table should be self-explanatory without surrounding context.
  • Content depth passes the "single-source" test. Ask yourself: after reading this page, would a user need to visit another website to fully understand the topic? If yes, your content is not comprehensive enough for AI systems to prefer it as a source. AI platforms favor single, authoritative sources that answer the query completely. How to Rank in AI Search

3. Schema & Structured Data for AI

Schema markup helps AI systems understand the context, type, and relationships within your content. Basic schema (Organization, Article) is table stakes. AI visibility requires deeper schema implementation.

  • FAQPage schema on pages with FAQ sections. Every FAQ section must be wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD structured data. Each question-answer pair should be a Question object with name and acceptedAnswer properties. This makes your FAQs eligible for Google FAQ rich results and dramatically increases AI extraction rates. Validate at Google's Rich Results Test. Schema Markup Guide
  • HowTo schema for instructional content. Any step-by-step guide or tutorial should include HowTo schema with individual steps marked up as HowToStep objects. AI systems use HowTo schema to structure procedural answers, and pages with this markup are significantly more likely to be cited for "how to" queries.
  • Speakable markup for voice-ready content. Add SpeakableSpecification schema to identify your most important, voice-ready passages — typically introductions, key definitions, and summary sections. This helps Google Assistant, Alexa, Siri, and other voice-enabled AI systems identify which parts of your content to read aloud.
  • Person and Organization schema for E-E-A-T. Implement Person schema on author pages with credentials, experience, and profile links. Implement Organization schema on your homepage. These entity schemas help AI systems assess your credibility and trustworthiness when deciding whether to cite your content. E-E-A-T Optimization Guide
  • Schema validation with zero errors. Invalid schema is worse than no schema. It signals technical incompetence and can prevent rich results. Run all schema through the Schema.org validator and Google's Rich Results Test. Fix every error. Pay particular attention to required properties and correct data types.

4. Entity Clarity & E-E-A-T Signals

AI systems evaluate source credibility before citing content. Entity clarity — making it unambiguous who you are, what you do, and why you are a trusted source — directly impacts whether AI chooses your content over a competitor's.

  • Author bylines on all content pages. Every content page must display a visible author name linked to an author bio page. The bio should include relevant credentials, years of experience, and links to external profiles (LinkedIn, industry publications). AI systems use author signals as a quality indicator. Anonymous content receives fewer AI citations.
  • About page with clear entity description. Your About page should clearly state who you are, what your organization does, and what specific expertise you bring. Include verifiable facts: years in business, team qualifications, notable clients or projects, and awards or certifications. AI systems reference About pages to validate source authority.
  • Consistent NAP and entity information. Your brand name, contact information, and entity description should be consistent across your website, schema markup, Google Business Profile, and all external profiles. Inconsistencies create ambiguity that makes AI systems less confident in citing you.
  • External validation signals. AI systems cross-reference your claimed expertise against external sources. Ensure your brand and authors are mentioned on third-party sites, have verifiable credentials, and appear in relevant industry directories. This is not about building backlinks for PageRank — it is about making your expertise verifiable.

5. Citation Readiness

This category measures whether your content has the attributes that make AI systems actively want to cite it. Citation readiness is the difference between being indexed and being referenced.

  • Specific statistics and data points. Content with concrete numbers is cited at a much higher rate than content with vague qualitative claims. Instead of "many websites have slow page speed," write "68% of websites fail Google's Core Web Vitals, with a median LCP of 4.2 seconds (based on HTTP Archive data, March 2026)." Always include the source and date for your data.
  • Data tables with structured information. Original data presented in well-structured HTML tables is one of the most-cited content types across AI platforms. Create tables that compare, quantify, or organize information that users frequently search for. Tables should have clear headers and be parseable without surrounding context.
  • Source attribution for all claims. Link every factual claim to its original source. AI systems track citation patterns — content that cites authoritative sources is treated as more reliable than content that makes unsourced assertions. Prefer primary sources (original research, official data) over secondary sources (news articles about research).
  • Quotable passages with brand attribution. Include passages that are designed to be quoted. These should be clear, factual, self-contained statements that include your brand name or author name near the key insight. AI systems often attribute citations to the source mentioned closest to the cited fact.
  • Content freshness signals. Display accurate publication and last-updated dates. Include current-year data and references. AI systems strongly favor recent, updated content over stale material. A comprehensive guide updated this month outperforms a thin new article published today. Google AI Overviews Guide
!
Priority: Start with Crawler Access

If AI crawlers are blocked in your robots.txt, nothing else in this checklist matters. We observed that 71% of websites block at least one major AI crawler. Check your robots.txt first — it takes 30 seconds and may be the single highest-impact fix. How to configure robots.txt for AI

Run Your Free AI Visibility Audit Now

Our scanner checks 245 factors across SEO, AEO & GEO. Get your 3 scores in seconds — no signup required.

How to Run Your AI Visibility Audit: Step by Step

You can run an AI visibility audit either manually (using the checklist above) or automatically using our free scanner. Here is the step-by-step process we recommend for a thorough audit.

1
Scan
Enter your URL at seoscore.tools to get your 3 scores (SEO, AEO, GEO) across 250 checks in seconds
2
Identify Gaps
Review each score breakdown. Focus on failed checks in AEO and GEO — these are your biggest opportunities
3
Check Crawlers
Verify your robots.txt allows GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot. Check for LLMS.txt. This is the #1 fix
4
Fix Structure
Add FAQ sections, Q&A headings, data tables, and schema markup to your top pages
5
Re-Scan
Run the scan again to verify improvements. Track your scores over time. Repeat monthly

Manual Testing: Ask the AI Directly

In addition to automated scanning, perform manual tests. Go to ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google (with AI Mode enabled) and search for queries related to your core topics. Check whether your website appears in the citations. If it does not, your AI visibility is low regardless of what automated scores show. This qualitative check complements the quantitative data from your scan.

For WordPress Users: Automate with the Plugin

If your site runs on WordPress, the SEO Autopilot plugin can automate many of the fixes in this checklist. It scans 207 checks directly within your WordPress dashboard and can auto-fix common issues like missing schema, FAQ structure gaps, and meta tag problems. The plugin uses the same 3-score framework (SEO, AEO, GEO) and provides one-click fixes for over 65 common issues.

Data & Benchmarks: The State of AI Visibility in 2026

Based on our analysis of 2,000+ websites scanned through seoscore.tools between January and March 2026, here is the current state of AI visibility across the web. These numbers paint a stark picture of how unprepared most websites are for AI search.

Avg SEO Score
76%
76/100
Avg AEO Score
28%
28/100
Avg GEO Score
13%
13/100

Key Findings

Metric Finding Implication
LLMS.txt Adoption Only 12% of websites have one 88% miss the easiest AI visibility win
AI Crawler Blocks 71% block at least one AI crawler Majority are invisible to at least one AI platform
FAQ Schema Only 23% have FAQ schema on any page 77% miss FAQ rich results and AI extraction
Speakable Markup Under 4% implement Speakable schema 96% are not optimized for voice AI
Data Tables Only 18% include comparison tables 82% miss the highest-cited content format
Author Bylines 41% have visible author attribution 59% lack basic E-E-A-T signals for AI trust
AEO Score > 70 Only 8% of websites 92% have significant AEO improvement opportunities
GEO Score > 50 Only 5% of websites 95% are essentially invisible to AI search features

The opportunity is enormous. Because so few websites are optimized for AI visibility, even basic improvements can create significant competitive advantages. Websites that raise their AEO score from below 30 to above 70 — achievable through the checklist in this article — typically see a measurable increase in AI citations within 4-8 weeks of implementation, based on our observations.

i
Correlation vs Causation

We want to be transparent about what this data shows. We observe correlations between higher AEO/GEO scores and increased AI citations. We have not proven causation through controlled experiments. The relationship makes logical sense (better-structured content is easier for AI to extract), but we present these findings as observations, not guarantees. SEO vs AEO vs GEO Explained

See Where You Stand

Get your SEO, AEO & GEO scores in seconds. Compare against the benchmarks above.

Before vs After: The Impact of an AI Visibility Audit

Here is what we typically observe when website owners work through this checklist and implement the recommended changes.

Before Audit

Typical Website (Unoptimized)

  • GPTBot and ClaudeBot blocked in robots.txt
  • No LLMS.txt file
  • No FAQ sections on any page
  • Dense paragraphs with no Q&A format
  • Basic Article schema only
  • No author bylines or E-E-A-T signals
  • No data tables or statistics
  • AEO: 22/100 | GEO: 9/100
  • Zero AI citations across all platforms
After Audit (4-6 Weeks)

Same Website (Optimized)

  • All AI crawlers allowed in robots.txt
  • LLMS.txt live with key pages listed
  • FAQ sections on 10 key pages with schema
  • Q&A headings + direct-answer format
  • FAQ, HowTo, Speakable, Person schema
  • Author bylines linked to bio pages
  • Comparison tables + cited statistics
  • AEO: 71/100 | GEO: 54/100
  • Content cited in ChatGPT and Perplexity

Frequently Asked Questions

An AI visibility audit is a systematic review of your website's discoverability, citability, and authority across AI-powered search platforms including ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Perplexity, Bing Copilot, and Claude. It goes beyond traditional SEO to measure AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) readiness. The audit evaluates whether AI systems can find your content, extract answers from it, and cite it as a trusted source. You can run one for free at seoscore.tools.

A traditional SEO audit focuses on meta tags, backlinks, page speed, and crawlability for Google's organic results. An AI visibility audit adds layers that traditional audits miss: AI crawler access (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot in robots.txt), content structure for extraction (FAQ format, concise definitions, Q&A headings), schema depth beyond basic types (Speakable, HowTo, entity markup), citation readiness (data tables, statistics, source attribution), and LLMS.txt presence. Based on our analysis, 88% of websites have no LLMS.txt file and 71% block at least one major AI crawler. For a complete traditional audit checklist, see our SEO Audit Checklist.

There are two approaches: manual testing and automated scanning. For manual testing, ask ChatGPT and Perplexity questions about your core topics and check if they cite your website. For automated scanning, use seoscore.tools to get your AEO and GEO scores, which measure your content's citability and AI search readiness across 250 checks. A low AEO score (below 40) typically means AI assistants cannot efficiently extract answers from your content. A low GEO score (below 30) means your content lacks the comprehensiveness, data depth, and authority signals that AI search platforms look for when selecting sources.

Based on our analysis of 2,000+ websites, the single highest-impact fix is ensuring AI crawlers can access your content. Check your robots.txt for blocks on GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, and PerplexityBot. After that, the three highest-impact content changes are: (1) adding FAQ sections with FAQ schema to your key pages, (2) structuring content with Q&A format headings followed by direct answers in the first sentence, and (3) including specific data points, statistics, and source citations. These three content changes alone can improve AEO scores by 30-50 points in our observations. Read our robots.txt for AI guide for detailed instructions.

We recommend running a quick AI visibility scan weekly and a comprehensive audit monthly. The AI search landscape evolves rapidly — Google updates AI Overviews frequently, ChatGPT's browsing capabilities expand, and new AI search platforms emerge regularly. Additionally, run an immediate audit after any major content changes, CMS updates, or robots.txt modifications. Automated tools like seoscore.tools make weekly scanning practical by checking 245 factors in seconds. The sites that maintain consistent AI visibility are the ones that monitor it continuously, not the ones that check once and assume everything is fine.

"The websites winning AI search traffic in 2026 are not doing anything exotic. They are doing the basics well: letting AI crawlers in, structuring content for extraction, and making their expertise verifiable. The hard part is not knowing what to do — it is systematically auditing and fixing what is already on your site."

— Atilla Kuruk, SEO Engineer & Tool Builder

Sources & References

Key Takeaways

  1. AI search is a separate channel that requires a separate audit. Traditional SEO audits miss the factors that determine AI visibility: crawler access, content extractability, schema depth, and citation readiness. You need both a traditional SEO audit and an AI visibility audit.
  2. The 3-score framework provides a complete picture. Measure your SEO score (can search engines find you?), AEO score (can AI assistants cite you?), and GEO score (can AI search feature you?). Most websites score well on SEO but fail dramatically on AEO and GEO.
  3. Start with AI crawler access. 71% of websites block at least one major AI crawler. Checking and fixing your robots.txt takes 30 seconds and may be the single highest-impact change you make. Create an LLMS.txt file while you are at it — only 12% of websites have one.
  4. Structure content for extraction, not just reading. FAQ sections, Q&A headings, concise definitions, comparison tables, and bullet lists are the content formats that AI systems extract most reliably. Dense, unstructured paragraphs get skipped.
  5. Data wins citations. Content with specific statistics, data tables, and source attributions is cited at a significantly higher rate than content with vague qualitative statements. Be specific. Cite your sources. Present data in tables.
  6. The opportunity is now. With 92% of websites scoring below 70 on AEO and 95% scoring below 50 on GEO, even basic optimization puts you far ahead of most competitors. The window for early-mover advantage is still open. Run your free scan to see where you stand.
AK

Atilla Kuruk

SEO Engineer & Tool Builder · Google Digital Marketing Certified · 7x Anthropic Academy

Atilla is the creator of seoscore.tools and the SEO Autopilot WordPress plugin. He specializes in SEO, AEO, and GEO optimization and has scanned thousands of websites to develop the 3-score framework for AI visibility measurement.